Teleological Ethics and the Moral-Legal Justification of Abortion: A Utilitarian Perspective

Authors

  • Salsabila SMA Swasta Al-Azhar Plus Medan Author
  • M. Razkiazka M H. SMA Swasta Al-Azhar Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70182/jca.v1i6.328

Keywords:

Abortion, Teleological Ethics, Utilitarianism

Abstract

This study examines the moral and legal justification of abortion through the lens of teleological ethics, particularly utilitarianism. Employing a qualitative methodology, it analyzes classical philosophical texts, contemporary academic literature, and legal frameworks to assess how outcome-based ethical reasoning informs abortion debates. Findings indicate that utilitarian ethics support abortion access as a means to reduce suffering and enhance societal well-being, especially for marginalized populations. However, the analysis also acknowledges critiques concerning the moral status of the fetus and the limitations of purely consequentialist approaches. The study concludes that while teleological ethics provide a flexible framework for evaluating abortion, integrating deontological principles may offer a more comprehensive ethical discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atuhaire, S. (2019). Abortion Among Adolescents in Africa: A Review of Practices, Consequences, and Control Strategies. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2842

Begun, S., Kattari, S. K., McKay, K., Winter, V. R., & O’Neill, E. A. (2016). Exploring U.S. Social Work Students’ Sexual Attitudes and Abortion Viewpoints. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1186586

Blackshaw, B. P. (2023). Abortion Policies at the Bedside: A Response. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108948

Bwalya, P. (2022). Assessing Factors Contributing to Unsafe Abortion Practice Among Women of Reproductive Age. Texila International Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijph.2013.10.03.art024

Gluchman, V. (2016). Disaster Issues in Non-Utilitarian Consequentialism (Ethics of Social Consequences)1. Human Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0007

Gramma, R. (2022). From Individual`s Rights to Public Benefits – A Conflict of Values in Healthcare. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.3.07

Hersey, A., Potter-Rutledge, J.-M., & Brown, B. P. (2022). Abortion Policies at the Bedside: Incorporating an Ethical Framework in the Analysis and Development of Abortion Legislation. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108412

Mcgee, R. W. (2022). On Abortion: Utilitarianism and Deontology. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35731.55845

Oyeniran, A. A., Bello, F. A., Oluborode, B., Awowole, I., Loto, O. M., Irinyenikan, T. A., Fabamwo, A. O., Olutayọ, A. Ọlanrewaju, Ganatra, B., Guest, P., & Fawole, B. (2019). Narratives of Women Presenting With Abortion Complications in Southwestern Nigeria: A Qualitative Study. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217616

Redd, S. K., Mosley, E. A., Narasimhan, S., Newton-Levinson, A., AbiSamra, R., Cwiak, C., Hall, K. S., Hartwig, S. A., Pringle, J., & Rice, W. S. (2023). Estimation of Multiyear Consequences for Abortion Access in Georgia Under a Law Limiting Abortion to Early Pregnancy. Jama Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1598

Savulescu, J., & Schuklenk, U. (2017). Doctors Have No Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception. Bioethics, 31(3), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12288

Schott, S., Adams, A., Dougherty, R. J., Montgomery, T., Lapite, F. C., & Fletcher, F. E. (2023). Renewed Calls for Abortion-Related Research in the Post-Roe Era. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322299

Shaw, J. (2019). Abortion in Canada as a Social Justice Issue in Contemporary Canada. Critical Social Work. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v14i2.5878

Singh, S. (2010). Global Consequences of Unsafe Abortion. Women S Health. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.10.70

Sumner, L. W. (2014). Abortion: A Case Study in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.

Tutić, A., Haiser, F., & Krumpal, I. (2024). Social Class and Moral Judgment: A Process Dissociation Perspective. Frontiers in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1391214

Zulu, J. M., Ali, J., Hallez, K., Kass, N. E., Michelo, C., & Hyder, A. A. (2018). Ethical Challenges in Research on Post-Abortion Care With Adolescents: Experiences of Researchers in Zambia. Global Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2018.1528657

Published

2025-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Teleological Ethics and the Moral-Legal Justification of Abortion: A Utilitarian Perspective. (2025). Jurnal Cakrawala Akademika, 1(6), 2132-2139. https://doi.org/10.70182/jca.v1i6.328